Image 1 of 5
Image 2 of 5
Image 3 of 5
Image 4 of 5
Image 5 of 5
Mini Gaming PC Specifications
1-Year Warranty; lightweight alloy chassis, mobile desktop performance.
Ports: 4× USB 3.2, 4× USB 2.0, 3× DisplayPort 2.1, 1× HDMI 2.1.
Storage: 2× SSD slots for high-speed NVMe or SATA drives.
Networking & Audio: 2× RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5 mm combo jack, Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) & Bluetooth.
Performance: Intel Core i9 CPU + NVIDIA RTX GPU.
Memory: Supports up to 96 GB DDR5 RAM for advanced multitasking and heavy workloads.
Power Supply: 300–400 W rated PSU for sustained desktop-grade GPU performance.
OS: Windows 11 Pro installed (Windows 10 available on request).
Who’s it for?
Creators & Editors: Intel Core i9 CPU handles extreme multi-core workloads, rendering, encoding, and AI-assisted editing with ease.
Gamers: Desktop-class RTX GPU delivers high FPS at 1440p and powers modern AAA titles smoothly.
Streamers: Multitask seamlessly — stream, edit, and game simultaneously without lag.
Tech Enthusiasts: Compact mini PC with full desktop-grade performance, high-speed connectivity, and upgrade potential.
Processor Performance
| Intel CPUs | AMD CPUs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Score | Processor | Score |
| i9-14900F | 46,850 | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D | 42,377 |
| Intel i7-14700K | 33,860 | AMD Ryzen 9 9900X | 34,549 |
| Processor | Score |
|---|---|
| i9-14900F | 46,850 |
| Intel i7-14700K | 33,860 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D | 42,377 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 9900X | 34,549 |
Summary: The Intel i9-14900F leads all tested CPUs with 46,850 points. AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D is the closest competitor, while Intel i7-14700K and AMD Ryzen 9 9900X follow slightly behind in multi-core performance.
GPU Real-World Performance
| RTX 5060 Ti 16GB (Desktop) | RTX 5060 (Desktop) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Source / Benchmark | Average FPS / Score | Source / Benchmark | Average FPS / Score |
| TechPowerUp / UserBenchmark – 1080p Gaming (15 titles) | ~120 FPS avg | Same test suite | ~110 FPS avg (≈ 8–10% slower) |
| NotebookCheck – Blender / CUDA Performance | ~3,100 points | Same workload | ~2,850 points (≈ 8% lower) |
| UserBenchmark – Aggregate Performance Index | 100% | Relative to 5060 Ti | ≈ 92% of performance |
| Tom’s Hardware – Power & Efficiency | 180 W TGP, Full Desktop Core | Same review series | 160 W TGP |
| Test / Source | Performance |
|---|---|
| 5060 Ti 16GB vs 5060 | ≈ 14 % faster (avg) – higher FPS and more compute headroom |
| 1080p Gaming (15 titles) | 5060 Ti 16GB ~120 FPS vs 5060 ~110 FPS (–8–10%) |
| Blender / CUDA Render | 5060 Ti 16GB 3,100 pts vs 5060 2,850 pts (≈ 8% slower) |
| UserBenchmark Index | 5060 Ti 16GB 100% vs 5060 ≈ 92% |
| Tom’s Hardware (TGP) | 180 W vs 160 W |
Summary: The RTX 5060 Ti 16GB outpaces the RTX 5060 by roughly 14 % in real-world gaming and productivity workloads. The Ti variant offers greater headroom for future graphics demands and sustained performance under load.
Why This Build?
Extreme Multi-Core & GPU Power: Intel Core i9 CPU & NVIDIA RTX GPU deliver desktop-class performance for gaming, AI, and creative workloads.
Future-Ready Connectivity: DP 2.1, HDMI 2.1, dual Ethernet, and Wi-Fi 6 support every modern display and peripheral.
Compact & Reliable: Rugged alloy chassis with 300–400 W PSU provides stable desktop-grade power in a mini form factor.
